Draft of query letter to Mr. Jatin Jalundhwala

Address of Jatin R Jalundhwala

602, Satkrut , PARTHSARATHI AVENUE

NR. SHYAMAL ROW HOUSE

132 RING ROAD

SATELLITE ROAD

AHMEDABAD 380 015 , GUJARAT

PHONE : RESID 079-26766226, 079- 26425147

WORK : 079-26560771

Reference links:-
L-1 Text of written arguments submitted on 11-3-2003 by Mr. Mody

http://mediagtbpsm.blogspot.com/2004/10/written-arguments-presented-by-mr-mody.html

L-2 Text of written arguments submitted on 17-3-2003 by Mr. Mody

http://mediagtbpsm.blogspot.com/2004/09/text-of-written-arguments-on-17-3-2003.html

L-3 Text of appeal from order filed by Mr. Mody as under:-


http://www.afo176.blogspot.com/

L-4 Text of complaint filed against Mr. Saurabh Soparkar as under :-

http://www.gtbcore.blogspot.com

SOME LEAD QUESTIONS THAT CAN BE RAISED TO JATIN JALUNDHWALA- through Registar of Gujarat High court hcguj@guj.nic.in or through the magistrate of Metropolitan Court -15 ,situated at Meghaninagar in Ahmedabad-in criminal defamation case 3326/99 filed by Core Health care against Mr. Mody.

v WHY DID YOU DECIDE TO SUBJECT MR. MODY TO POLICE REMAND FOR A PALTRY SUM OF RS 8 LAKHS THROUGH NAVRANGPURA POLICE STATION IN DECEMBER 1999 ,WHEN YOU HAD BEEN GENEROUS ENOUGH TO CREATE CHARGE ON RUPMANGALAM AND FLOVIN ASSETS IN FAVOUR OF GTB IN AUGUST 1998 FOR RS 11 CRORES EVEN WHEN YOU WERE AS AN EMPLOYEE OF CORE HEALTH CARE WERE CONSCIOUS THAT AMERICAN EXPRESS HAD FILED WINDING UP PETITION AGAINST CHL AND THE MATTER HAD COME UP FOR HEARING IN GUJARAT HIGH COURT AROUND SEPTEMBER 1997?

v WHEN MR MODY FILED CIVIL SUIT 5827/01 AND OBTAINED STAY ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY RUPMANGALAM AND FLOVIN WHY YOU DID NOT USE THIS AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO GET BACK FROM CHL WHEN A SUM AS HIGH AS RS 12.5 CRORES WAS INVOLVED? WHAT WAS THE REASON FOR SUCH GENEROSTIY TO CORE HEALTH CARE AND SEVERE LEGAL ACTION SUCH AS POLICE REMAND AGAINST MR. MODY FOR A PALTRY SUM OF RS EIGHT LAKHS ??

v WHY YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO FURNISH A REPLY GIVEN BY MODY’S ADVOCATE K V SHELAT AS BACK AS JANUARY /FEBRUARY 1999 IN RESPECT TO THE NOTICES SENT BY YOU REPRESENTING DHANYUSHYA BEFORE HOLDING MR MODY TO REMAND ?

v YOU AND AMEET DESAI WERE ON BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TECHNOLOGY FINANCE LTD WHICH HAPPENED TO BE SUBSIDIARY OF CORE HEALTH CARE AND CORE HEALTH CARE HAD ADVANCED INTERERST FREE TERM LOAN OF A SUM OF RS 39 CRORES TO TECHNOLGY FINANCE LTD AND RETAINING THIS SUM YOU HAD BEEN GENEROUS TO EXTEND BY CREATING A CHARGE ON ASSETS OF DHANYUSHYA,RUPMAGALM,FLOVIN YOU MANAGED TO ADVANCE AN INTEREST BEARING SUM OF RS 12.5 CRORES THROUGH GLOBAL TRUST BANK TO CORE HEALTH CARE AND WITHOUT EXPECTATING IN RETURN FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS OF THE COMPANIES YOU ALLEGED TO HOLD DIRECTORSHIP THAT IS RUPMANGALM AND FLOVIN. WHAT IS THE EXPALANATION YOU HAVE FOR THAT?? Refer notice to Sushil Handa and Core Health Care as per the link:-

http://mediagtbpsm.blogspot.com/2004/10/notice-issued-to-sushil-handa-of-core.html

v WHY DID YOU ACCEPT SO CALLED ALLEGED RESIGNATION FOR RUPMANGALAM IN SEPTEMBER 1996, WHEN YOU HAD GRIEVANCES OF ALLEGED NONCOMPLIANCES IN MATTER RELATED TO FLOVIN AS REFERRED IN NOITCE ADDRESSED TO MODY AS LATE AS OCTOBER 1998 ???

v IN CASE YOU JALUNDHWALA CLAIMED DIRECTORSHIP OF FLOVININ 1997, WHY DID YOU NOT DEPOSIT THE AMOUNT FIRST IN FLOVIN’S TEXTILE TRADERS ACCOUNT AND THEN ISSUE PAYMENT TO BANK OF INDIA FOR OVER SEVENTY LAKHS??? YOU WERE NOT CONFIDENT THAT YOU WERE DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY WHO COULD WITHDRAW AMOUNT FROM TEXTILE TRADERS BANK ACCOUNT??

v WHY YOU FAILED TO FURNISH DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TO COURT COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUIT 5827/2001 ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU HAD PROMISED TO COURT COMMISSIONER ON 8TH JANUARY 2002 AS PER COURT COMMISSIONER REPORT SIGNED BY YOU??

v WHY YOU FAILED TO HAVE YOURSELF REPRESENTED BY AN ADVOCATE IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION 25 AND 26 SO AS TO PROTECT THE INTEREST OF RUPMANGALAM AND FLOVIN AS ON ACCOUNT OF CORE HEALTH CARE’S NON PAYMENT THE ASSETS OF RUPMANGALAM AND FLOVIN WAS IN JEOPARDY??

v YOU HAVE FURNISHED COPIES OF MOUS IN CITY CIVIL COURT IN CIVIL SUIT 5827 MATTER AND WHERE IN THERE IS MENTION PRESENCE OF ESCROW PERSONS CONSISTING OF MR HEMANT KASHIPAREKH AND MR. SOPARKAR WHO HAVE DENIED THAT THEY HAVE PLAYED ROLE OF ESCROW PERSONS HAVING DENIED THAT THEY HAVE HANDED OVER ANY DOCUMENTS TO DHANYUHSHYA AND/OR YOU.IF SO , HOW HAVE YOU OBTAINED THE DOCUMENTS AND CREATED CHARGE WITH GTB ON IMMOVEABLE PROPERTY OF RUPMANGLAM AND FLOVIN???

Refer the link of complaint filed against Mr. Saurabh Soparkar in this regard to the Bar Council of Gujarat as per the link as under:-

Text of complaint filed against Mr. Saurabh Soparkar as under :-

http://www.barcoun.blogspot.com

v WHY YOU FAILED TO FILE WRITTEN AFFIDAVIT IN APPEAL FROM ORDER 176/03 AND ANSWER THE QUERIES RAISED BY MR MODY AND ALSO WHY DID YOU NOT HIRE ANY ADVOCATE IN THIS MATTER??? Refer the text of appeal from order as under:-

http://www.afo176.blogspot.com

v WHAT IS YOUR WRITTEN REPLY TO THE CONTENTIONS AND ISSUES RAISED BY MR. MODY IN THE APPEAL FROM ORDER 176/03?

v HOW COME THE SHARE OWNERSHIP OF ALL MODY FAMILY MEMBERS IS NOT REFLECTED SIMULTANEOUSLY IN DHANYUSHYA’S BALANCE SHEET??

v HOW COME SHARE OWNERSHIP OF PANKAJ MODY FAMILY IS NOT REFLECTED IN AUDITED B/S OF DHANYUHSYA IN 1996-97 ??

v WHAT STEPS YOU HAVE TAKEN AGAINST CORE HEALTH CARE FOR RECOVEY FOR RS 12.5 CRORES WHEN YOU HAVE BEEN HARSH WITH MR MODY BY SUBJECTING MODY TO POLICE REMAND FOR FIVE DAYS ??

v HOW COME YOU – JALUNDHWALA WERE SILENT TO WHAT WAS CALLED FOR AS NARRATED IN PARA NINE OF APPEAL FROM ORDER 176/2003 ??? what do you have to say about this ?

v FURNISH DETAILED REPLY TO WRITTEN ARGUMENTS FURNISHED BY MR. MODY IN CITY CIVIL SUIT 5827/2001 VIDE 11-3-2003 AND 17-3-2003. Refer links as under:-

Text of written arguments submitted on 11-3-2003 by Mr. Mody

http://mediagtbpsm.blogspot.com/2004/10/written-arguments-presented-by-mr-mody.html

Text of written arguments submitted on 17-3-2003 by Mr. Mody

http://mediagtbpsm.blogspot.com/2004/09/text-of-written-arguments-on-17-3-2003.html

v. What is the reply furnished by Mr. Hemant Kashiparekh to the letter dated 29-7-1999 addressed to Mr. Kashiparekh by Mr. Mody ?? what is the reply given by Mr. Hemant Kashiparekh in this regard??

Letter addressed on 29-7-99 to Hemant Kashiparekh

http://kashiparekh.blogspot.com/2004/09/letter-addressed-to-kashiparekh-on-29.html


In case you have not been a party to banking fraud relating with GTB , you should not have any difficulty in giving the answers. Your silence would be construed that you are involved in banking fraud committed in collusion with others.